The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, particularly for enhancing care transitions, is becoming more prevalent. However, the methods by which AI models generate predictions and recommend interventions can vary greatly. Some approaches, particularly those leveraging large language models (LLMs), rely heavily on complex algorithms and generic prompts that offer limited transparency. In contrast, there is a growing movement towards AI systems that emphasize explainability and are directly guided by clinical expertise, ensuring safer, more reliable decision-making.
As AI and LLMs become more integrated into healthcare, it is essential to develop frameworks that prioritize patient safety, clinical expertise, and evidence-based practice. A reasoning-based approach to AI offers a novel pathway, leveraging the power of AI while ensuring recommendations remain grounded in medical knowledge.
We believe there are three components (and advantages) of this reasoning-based approach to AI-enabled care management, all of which contribute to enhancing care transitions and improving patient outcomes.
A key differentiator in responsible AI systems is the use of physician-guided reasoning to structure outputs, rather than relying solely on black-box algorithms. The foundation of this approach is a comprehensive set of risk factors and interventions, defined and validated by experienced physicians. These risk factors are rooted in specific diagnostic criteria and medical metadata, aligning closely with the latest clinical guidelines and peer-reviewed literature. By anchoring AI outputs in a clinician-driven knowledge base, the system ensures that its recommendations reflect current medical standards and are tailored to the complexities of patient care.
AI-generated interventions are broken down into specific, actionable steps. Each intervention action includes a priority level, a clear description, interaction types, designated healthcare professionals responsible for the action, and recommended tools. This structured framework ensures that recommendations are practical, easily implementable, and aligned with the workflows of care teams
Interventions often require input from a range of healthcare professionals, including nurses, physician assistants, care managers, and specialists like cardiologists or pulmonologists. This multidisciplinary approach acknowledges the complexity of patient care and ensures that AI recommendations can be integrated seamlessly into care team structures, supporting coordinated and comprehensive treatment plans.
“AI tools grounded in evidence-based guidelines provide the transparency physicians need to trust the recommendations. To be effective, we must have confidence in the reasoning behind the AI’s decisions, ensuring we can focus our attention on the patients who need it most.”
“AI tools grounded in evidence-based guidelines provide the transparency physicians need to trust the recommendations. To be effective, we must have confidence in the reasoning behind the AI’s decisions, ensuring we can focus our attention on the patients who need it most.”
This reasoning-based approach represents a significant improvement over traditional LLM prompting, offering several distinct advantages:
The AI operates within a clinically validated framework of risk factors and interventions, which minimizes the risk of irrelevant or inaccurate outputs. This controlled environment ensures that recommendations remain focused on patient-specific conditions and needs.
One of the major challenges with LLMs is their black-box nature. In contrast, this reasoning-based approach provides full transparency, with each AI-generated recommendation traceable to specific evidence-based clinical guidelines. This makes the decision-making process clear, auditable, and easier for clinicians to trust and implement. Without clear explainability it is unlikely that clinicians will adopt any new tool, especially one powered by AI.
While AI helps streamline the identification of risks and recommendations, it never replaces clinical judgment. The system relies on human oversight for the definition, review, and updating of risk factors and interventions, ensuring that medical expertise remains central to patient care.
The structured intervention framework ensures that AI-generated outputs are consistent, actionable, and ready for immediate integration into clinical workflows. By standardizing the outputs, the system helps maintain quality and alignment across different care teams and settings.
By basing the AI’s analysis on predefined, clinically validated content, this approach significantly reduces the risk of AI-generated errors, “hallucinations”, or inappropriate recommendations. It contrasts with LLMs that generate outputs based on less structured inputs (prompts and clinical data), which can introduce variability and potential inaccuracies.
Applications in Care Transitions
These three principles are particularly applicable in care transitions, where managing the patient handoffs between different care settings is critical. AI-driven platforms can harness this reasoning-based approach to improve coordination, activate appropriate interventions, and prevent adverse events such as readmissions or emergency department visits.
The importance of deploying responsible AI frameworks clinicians trust can not be overemphasized. At Cascala Health, we believe our approach demonstrates how responsible, transparent (safe) AI can be applied in real-world care management applications. By combining AI with rigorous clinical oversight, Cascala Health ensures that our platform not only enhances patient outcomes but also maintains high standards of safety, explainability, and accountability.
Our Perspective: Where (Safe) Healthcare AI is Headed…
As AI continues to shape the future of healthcare, adopting a reasoning-based approach that emphasizes clinical expertise, evidence-based practice, and patient safety will be essential for realizing the potential benefits of this technology while mitigating risks. By anchoring AI outputs in clinician-driven knowledge and maintaining transparency in its decision-making, this approach provides a more reliable, explainable, and ultimately safer framework for using AI in complex clinical environments like care transitions.
These three principles are particularly applicable in care transitions, where managing the patient handoffs between different care settings is critical. AI-driven platforms can harness this reasoning-based approach to improve coordination, activate appropriate interventions, and prevent adverse events such as readmissions or emergency department visits.
The importance of deploying responsible AI frameworks clinicians trust can not be overemphasized. At Cascala Health, we believe our approach demonstrates how responsible, transparent (safe) AI can be applied in real-world care management applications. By combining AI with rigorous clinical oversight, Cascala Health ensures that our platform not only enhances patient outcomes but also maintains high standards of safety, explainability, and accountability.
As AI continues to shape the future of healthcare, adopting a reasoning-based approach that emphasizes clinical expertise, evidence-based practice, and patient safety will be essential for realizing the potential benefits of this technology while mitigating risks. By anchoring AI outputs in clinician-driven knowledge and maintaining transparency in its decision-making, this approach provides a more reliable, explainable, and ultimately safer framework for using AI in complex clinical environments like care transitions.
References:
